March 25, 2024

Rep. Mike Levin Leads Letter with Sens. Padilla and Butler to Save San Clemente from Extra Costs Due to Army Corps’ Sand Replenishment Project Delay

Washington, D.C. –Rep. Mike Levin (CA-49) recently led a letter cosigned by U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-CA) and Laphonza Butler (D-CA) to Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works Michael Connor and Lt. Gen. Scott A. Spellmon, Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, to express their concerns over any potential financial burden and extra costs to the City of San Clemente caused by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ San Clemente Shoreline Project.

“As you know, this project has encountered major obstacles involving the sourcing of appropriate beach-quality sand from the originally identified offshore borrow site,” reads the letter. “The Corps has been working diligently to achieve approval for the use of an alternative borrow site at Surfside-Sunset, which has been used for other Corps’ beach sand replenishment projects and is a proven source.”

“We write to express our insistence that the corrections being made to the project do not incur additional financial exposure to the non-federal sponsor, the City of San Clemente,” the letter continues. “While we understand the non-federal sponsor’s cost share is 35%, the City should not be liable for the additional costs stemming from the unsuccessful attempts to utilize the original borrow site.”­­­

“The City of San Clemente was not included in the site selection process, but relied on the United States Army Corps of Engineers to conduct the necessary research and study to identify the borrow site for the sand. The City is hopeful that the Army Corps will complete the project identified in the agreement at the contracted price without further costs to the City of San Clemente,” said San Clemente Mayor Victor Cabral.

Click here or read the full letter below:

Dear Assistant Secretary Connor and Lt. General Spellmon:

Thank you for your continued attention to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) San Clemente Shoreline Project. We appreciate Lt. Gen. Spellmon committing that this project gets to 100% completion with the same quantity of beach-quality sand delivered as authorized by Congress.

As you know, this project has encountered major obstacles involving the sourcing of appropriate beach-quality sand from the originally identified offshore borrow site. The Corps has been working diligently to achieve approval for the use of an alternative borrow site at Surfside-Sunset, which has been used for other Corps’ beach sand replenishment projects and is a proven source. We appreciate Col. Andrew Baker at the Los Angeles District, Col. James Handura at the South Pacific Division, and their teams’ commitment and collaborative work with the City of San Clemente to achieve an effective solution.

We write to express our insistence that the corrections being made to the project do not incur additional financial exposure to the non-federal sponsor, the City of San Clemente. While we understand the non-federal sponsor’s cost share is 35%, the City should not be liable for the additional costs stemming from the unsuccessful attempts to utilize the original borrow site.

The Corps was responsible for identifying a suitable borrow site, and the City entered into an agreement to fulfill its part of this project with the understanding that the costs they were to bear were based on that original borrow site. It has been estimated that the City may now be required to provide $2,692,308 in additional funding to complete this project. The City had previously arranged to provide its share of financing in the total amount of $5,010,923 by procuring assistance from the State of California and using long-planned local funding for this project. Such a substantial increase in the City’s fiscal obligation is objectionable.

We ask the Corps to consider the extraordinary nature of this situation as well as the problems associated with the Corps’ analysis of the original borrow site. We urge you to work to find ways to mitigate the City’s exposure to these cost increases.

Again, we appreciate the Corps’ diligence in working to get this project to 100% completion and your consideration of the unique circumstances that merit special exception for this additional financial burden on the City of San Clemente. We would welcome a meeting to discuss this matter further.

##